Skip navigation mirage

Hyrax Femur 3D GeometryData from: Finite element modelling vs. classic beam theory: comparing methods for stress estimation in a morphologically diverse sample of vertebrate long bones.

Dryad Repository

Hyrax Femur 3D Geometry

When using this data, please cite the original article:

Brassey CA, Margetts L, Kitchener AC, Withers PJ, Manning PL, Sellers WI (2012) Finite element modelling vs. classic beam theory: comparing methods for stress estimation in a morphologically diverse sample of vertebrate long bones. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 10(79): 20120823.doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0823

Additionally, please cite the Dryad data package:

Brassey CA, Margetts L, Kitchener AC, Withers PJ, Manning PL, Sellers WI (2012) Data from: Finite element modelling vs. classic beam theory: comparing methods for stress estimation in a morphologically diverse sample of vertebrate long bones. Dryad Digital Repository. doi:10.5061/dryad.9ct2f
Cite | Share
Download the data package citation in the following formats:
   RIS (compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
   BibTex (compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)
 
DOI doi:10.5061/dryad.9ct2f/7
Pageviews 78
Downloaded 42 times
Keywords Finite element analysis, Beam theory, Biomechanics, Curvature, Cross-sectional asymmetry
Date Submitted 2012-12-11T18:37:30Z
Contained in Data Package Data from: Finite element modelling vs. classic beam theory: comparing methods for stress estimation in a morphologically diverse sample of vertebrate long bones.
Description
Procavia capensis (NMS.Z.2009.76). Body mass = 3.14kg. Created in GeoMagic Studio v12.

Files in this item

Icon
Name: hyrax.obj
Size: 1.922Mb
Format: Unknown
Description: dataset-file
View/Open
To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data.   CC0 open data

Search for data

Advanced search

Be part of Dryad